Would You Believe-We Submit to 700,000 Search Engines?

Submitting to 700,000 or more search engines is all well and
good, but do you know anyone who uses any of those obscure
search engines, if there are in fact that many in existence?

Please beware throwing good money into bad systems. To help
you sort the good from the detrimental, I will take you through
some of the promises you may see, and where you may have reason
to be skeptical:

1/ Incorrect Information

If the search engine optimisation provider (”SEO”) makes
statements like “Submitting your web site consistently is the #1
way to get indexed by search engines” you know they are not
talking about the most popular search engine to start with!
(ref: Footer 1) Just regularly re-submitting your site is not
enough to get you good rankings; the search engines are smarter
than that.

2/ Use of Automated Submission Tools / Reports

If overused, these may be detrimental to your site’s rank. The
more sophisticated search engines recognise the URLs of tools
that use programs (rather than people) to either continually
submit URLs or request ranking information. Use of these tools
is one way to get banned from being listed altogether. (ref:
Footer 2)

3/ The SEO’s / client’s search engine rankings

A quick test to see whether all the claims and testimonials
stack up for a particular SEO is to do a search via a major
search engine, to see where the SEO appears for obvious search
terms. Whilst clearly search engine optimisation is going to be
a very popular phrase on the internet, the better SEOs should at
least have their main URL appear in the first 5 pages of one of
your searches. Oh… please don’t go looking for my website in
the search engines as I’ve not employed SEO professionals on my
site… yet . You should also look for testimonials from
clients of the SEO, and test their search engine results for
appropriate search terms.

4/ Partners?

If an SEO does not appear in the search engine results, as I’ve
suggested in point 3/ then it seems a little odd when they also
claim that they are partners with that search engine. Even worse
is where the SEO uses practices specifically warned against by
the search engines that they claim to have as partners (see
point 6).

5/ Submitting to very large numbers of search engines

The important question here is, who do you know that actually
uses the obscure search engines that make up those very large
numbers? You are better off spending money on getting good
rankings in the handful of search engines that have a patronage
that is likely to make a difference to the number of visitors to
your site. You may wish to also target specific search engines
that focus on a sector that your website falls into eg. a
locality search engine.

6/ Doorway Pages / Cloaking

A mention of the use of doorway pages or cloaking techniques
should ring warning bells. These techniques were invented
years ago, and worked successfully for a time, in improving
search engine rankings. However, the better search engines have
been aware of these techniques for some time, and can detect
when they are being employed. Using these techniques is very
likely to get you banned from the most popular search engines.
(ref: Footer 3)

For an example of what can go wrong when you use doorway pages
and other so-called ’sneaky’ techniques, read about BMW Germany
being banned from Google here (published on 6th Feb, 2006):
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4685750.stm

* * * * * *

Certainly, not all search engine optimisation is bad - a
professional approach utilising a reputable SEO that focuses
on helping you achieve the best rankings without trying to trick
anyone, is a useful addition to your website marketing arsenal.
I recommend a well-rounded approach to website marketing, as
described in my article entitled “Build it and they will come?”.

Footnotes:

1. Refer to “Fiction: A website will be removed from Google’s
index if it’s ‘over-submitted’.” on the Google Information page
located here: http://www.google.com.au/webmasters/facts.html.
The key point made is: “your time is better spent improving the
content and links of your site”.

2. Refer to “Fiction: Automated ‘rank checking’ programs are a
good way for webmasters to save time and measure their online
presence.” on this Google Information page:
http://www.google.com.au/webmasters/facts.html.

3. Refer to the ‘Quality Guidelines - Specific recommendations’
section of the Webmaster Guidelines on the Google page:
http://www.google.com.au/webmasters/guidelines.html. The key
points are: “Avoid “doorway” pages created just for search
engines”, and also “Don’t employ cloaking or sneaky redirects”.

Copyright Contact Point IT Services. Publication or use of this
article on or off-line, without prior written permission from
the author, is prohibited. If you would like to use this article
on your Web site or in your publication, please contact us with
details of your desired use.